Story 03 · 12 October 2026
Everyone talks about humanoids. What do robotics companies actually build?
Tesla is preparing to build humanoids on a large scale, and Chinese makers ship them by the thousand. Yet the Uber founder just raised $1.7 billion for robots that are deliberately not humanoid. We looked at what robotics companies say they build, what they patent and what researchers publish — and the humanoid is a small part of each.
Field of viewOrganisations whose own description a language model filed by robot form (not checked one by one), the US patents granted in five robotics classes, the worldwide patent families of the humanoid makers the press and our list of Chinese makers name, and the papers we gathered; press facts are quoted from their pages. A company can build several forms; a patent can sit in several classes.How much can this map see?
01 · Two bets
Which robot is the future?
Tesla
Optimus
Quarterly report for the quarter ended 30 June 2026.
“A general purpose, autonomous humanoid robot”, with preparations for large-scale production, as the company reports it.
Source: Tesla’s quarterly report to the SEC.
Chinese makers
AgiBot and Unitree
8,400 humanoids shipped by AgiBot in the first half of 2026, more than Unitree shipped in all of 2025.
China: 97% of the world’s humanoid shipments in that half-year.
Source: Semafor, 11 August 2026, citing Smart Analytics Global.
Atoms
Travis Kalanick’s robots
$1.7 billion raised in a round led by Andreessen Horowitz, reported 22 July 2026.
A “wheelbase for robots”: “Humanoids have their place, but there's a lot of room for specialized robots”, in Kalanick’s words.
Source: TechCrunch, 13 March 2026 and 22 July 2026.
Two bets on the future of robots are being placed at once. Tesla is preparing to build humanoids on a large scale, and Chinese makers ship them by the thousand: AgiBot alone shipped 8,400 in the first half of 2026. Meanwhile Travis Kalanick, who founded Uber, raised $1.7 billion for Atoms — robots built on a common wheelbase, and deliberately not humanoid. The pictures are all of humanoids. We wanted to know what the rest of robotics is doing, in three records: what companies say they build, what gets patented, and what researchers publish.
02 · What companies say
What do robotics companies say they build?
Data table
| Item | organisations |
|---|---|
| No specific form | 211 |
| Mobile robot (AMR/AGV) | 124 |
| Arm / cobot | 96 |
| Component | 66 |
| Drone / UAV | 46 |
| Humanoid | 36 |
| Agricultural | 24 |
| Autonomous vehicle | 23 |
| Surgical / medical | 19 |
| Marine / underwater | 11 |
| Aircraft | 10 |
| Exoskeleton | 10 |
| Quadruped | 9 |
| Space | 8 |
| Micro / nano | 4 |
| Other legged | 2 |
Of the 572 organisations whose own description we could read, 36 describe a humanoid. 124 describe mobile robots — the carts and shuttles that move goods through warehouses and hospitals — and 96 arms. 211 describe no particular robot at all: software, sensors, parts, services. Our list leans towards the companies that call themselves robotics companies, and the reading is a machine’s. Even so, the humanoid is one form among many, and not the largest.
03 · What gets patented
What do patents protect?
Data table
| grant year | legged & walking | arms & grippers | self-driving control | surgical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 42.0 | 940.0 | 824.0 | 746.0 |
| 2016 | 46.0 | 1095.0 | 1018.0 | 827.0 |
| 2017 | 39.0 | 1281.0 | 1373.0 | 1001.0 |
| 2018 | 43.0 | 1427.0 | 1821.0 | 1022.0 |
| 2019 | 49.0 | 1869.0 | 2771.0 | 1446.0 |
| 2020 | 36.0 | 2272.0 | 3381.0 | 1724.0 |
| 2021 | 48.0 | 2228.0 | 3574.0 | 1780.0 |
| 2022 | 37.0 | 2491.0 | 3997.0 | 1746.0 |
| 2023 | 53.0 | 2699.0 | 3851.0 | 2157.0 |
| 2024 | 80.0 | 2969.0 | 3617.0 | 2365.0 |
| 2025 | 95.0 | 3132.0 | 2902.0 | 2459.0 |
Patents tell the same story more loudly. US grants for legged and walking robots, the class a humanoid’s legs fall into, went from 42 in 2015 to 95 in 2025. Grants for arms and grippers went from 940 to 3,132; for self-driving control from 824 to 2,902. A humanoid is a body on top of arms, hands and control; its patents may sit in those classes too. But the growth of robotics’ protected inventions is in hands and in machines that move themselves, not in legs.
04 · Who files, who publishes
Who files, who publishes?
Data table
| Measure | Maker or country | families or papers |
|---|---|---|
| Legged-robot patent families, 2020–2025 | UBTECH Robotics (China) | 85 |
| Legged-robot patent families, 2020–2025 | Boston Dynamics (United States) | 31 |
| Legged-robot patent families, 2020–2025 | XPENG Robotics (China) | 25 |
| Legged-robot patent families, 2020–2025 | LimX Dynamics (China) | 21 |
| Legged-robot patent families, 2020–2025 | Unitree Robotics (China) | 21 |
| Families titled humanoid, 2020–2025 | Fourier (China) | 75 |
| Families titled humanoid, 2020–2025 | UBTECH Robotics (China) | 38 |
| Families titled humanoid, 2020–2025 | LimX Dynamics (China) | 31 |
| Families titled humanoid, 2020–2025 | Leju Robot (China) | 5 |
| Families titled humanoid, 2020–2025 | Apptronik (United States) | 3 |
| Legged & humanoid papers, 2020–2024 | China | 1997 |
| Legged & humanoid papers, 2020–2024 | United States | 1198 |
| Legged & humanoid papers, 2020–2024 | Japan | 700 |
| Legged & humanoid papers, 2020–2024 | Germany | 279 |
| Legged & humanoid papers, 2020–2024 | India | 272 |
Legs and humanoids are a small share of robotics, but inside it the race has a clear leader. Of the worldwide legged-robot patent families the humanoid makers we follow filed since 2020, 84% are Chinese, 14% American; the makers filing most are UBTECH Robotics, Boston Dynamics and XPENG Robotics. In research the same order holds: 29% of the legged-and-humanoid papers of 2020–2024 are Chinese by fractional credit, 17% American. So the humanoid is a small bet for robotics as a whole, and a Chinese one. The press’s favourites — Tesla, Figure, 1X — file far less than their fame; our records, which lag the news, show where inventions are made, not where robots are sold.
Why we read two patent records. The worldwide extract holds the robotics publications of the Chinese, European and Japanese offices over the decade, and the American office’s only for the largest applicants, so a maker that files only in the United States is under-counted there: Tesla and Figure hold no family in it, and 1X Technologies two. In the US grants of our robotics classes since 2020, the register names Tesla on 24, Figure AI on 4 and 1X Technologies on none, against 203 for UBTECH Robotics and 170 for Boston Dynamics.
05 · What researchers publish
And research?
Data table
| year | legged & humanoid | manipulation | driving |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| 2001 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 4.4 |
| 2002 | 2.7 | 7.2 | 4.0 |
| 2003 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| 2004 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 4.9 |
| 2005 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 5.0 |
| 2006 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 4.8 |
| 2007 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 5.1 |
| 2008 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 5.2 |
| 2009 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 5.3 |
| 2010 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 5.3 |
| 2011 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 5.7 |
| 2012 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 5.8 |
| 2013 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 5.9 |
| 2014 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 6.4 |
| 2015 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 6.5 |
| 2016 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 6.6 |
| 2017 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 7.2 |
| 2018 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 7.7 |
| 2019 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 8.4 |
| 2020 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 9.1 |
| 2021 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 9.3 |
| 2022 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 9.8 |
| 2023 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 10.1 |
| 2024 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 10.4 |
| 2025 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 10.1 |
In research, legs are a small field and a shrinking share: the area of legged locomotion and humanoids held 2.9% of placed robotics papers in 2014 and 2.1% in 2025, while autonomous driving rose from 6.4% to 10.1%. So the humanoid is the picture, and the arm, the cart and the self-driving machine are the business — in what companies say, what they patent and what researchers publish. That may change fast: Chinese makers ship faster than our lagging records can show. Our collection of Chinese makers and trade shows has now landed: another source knows 27 of the 33 makers on our list, and 125 of the 313 exhibitors at Beijing’s latest World Robot Conference.